It’s not being paranoid if they really are out to git ya!
I don’t remember a time when if feels like our way of life is being attacked on so many fronts at the same time. One day you find that the economy is racing for disaster. The next day you find a school preventing a student from displaying the American flag. The day after that you discover the government is preparing to allow the United Nations to dictate our ability to “bear arms.” Then you find out how various government officials are supporting a Mosque near ground zero followed by news that a church that was damaged on 9/11 near ground zero is prevented from rebuilding.
In the same week you find out that the dollar is headed for the bargain basement and the government is eyeing the possibility of grabbing your 401K. Shortly thereafter you find that Social Security benefits are being reduced but they want to increase your Social Security taxes. In the mean time your house valuation is dropping like a rock while your property taxes are rising.
The government insists on searching citizens, including the elderly and babies, to make sure they are not terrorists, but attacks a State for trying to stop millions of illegal aliens from crossing its borders. We are supposed to be constitutionally protected from unreasonable searches, but are in danger of an $11,000 fine if we protest having a TSA agent inside our pants (the kind of behavior that would get any non-TSA agent jail time).
You see people trying to deal with the insanity in one area and before they make any progress something even crazier (is that a word?) crops up. It’s like playing “wake a mole.”
Monday, December 20, 2010
Terrorism and Manipulation
I'm not a conspiracy nut, at least I don't think I am, but it is getting harder and harder to ignore evidence.
My son and I have discussed this at length and there is a consistent theme for the last 40 years. In this case it is Wikileaks.
The thing that at first defies understanding, if true, is having an approximately 20 year old PFC with what should have been Top Secret clearance considering what he had access to. I am doubtful that a 20 year old PFC can acquire a Top Secret security clearance. Then allowing said PFC into and out of an area where he had access to this material carrying any kind of computer media. In this case it is said he had a CD RW disguised as a music CDROM (not much of a disguise). Then he had access all by himself without any oversight so that he could copy the material from a computer that did not have external media access disabled as it should have been (both CD write and USB stick access should have been disabled).
Over and over again we find the same pattern which appears once again. Someone in a position of authority (not our PFC) wants something to happen for an unknown reason. Then it is just a matter of finding the guy who may already have some motive for doing the wrong thing. You enhance that motive by making sure he talks with the right (wrong) people. Then you give him the access he would need to do the job and make sure the obstacles stay out of the way.
Think Lee Harvey Oswald, 1963. He somewhat magically went to Russia and returned. The last obstacle was the Secret Service agent who was supposed to be riding on the back bumper that day (he would have been in the line of fire). Hopefully you have seen the video where this agent is inexplicably ordered not to assume his normal position at the last moment much to his dismay.
The Christmas underwear bomber who received assistance getting on a plane, paying for a one-way ticket in cash, with no passport on an international flight all AFTER his father warns officials that his son is a threat.
We've seen how authorities spot these people in advance. The most recent case in Portland. Once they have them spotted it is only a matter of letting the ones that are likely to do what you want them to do get away with it. In fact, there was the FBI memo noting the problem with potential terrorists getting flight training BEFORE 9/11.
As they say follow the money.
Kennedy may have been about to pull the plug on Vietnam. Kennedy dies and we stay mired in Vietnam 10 more years.
9/11 happens and we get wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The shoe bomber fails to light his shoe (I have serious doubts whether it COULD be detonated). What do we get? The average citizen agrees to searches that previously would have been considered unreasonable.
The underwear bomber fails (again doubtful it could be detonated) and we get body scanners and intrusive pat downs that would have not only been considered unreasonable but rape.
Wikileaks happens and the government is on the verge of killing free speach on the internet and putting the FCC in control of the last free media.
This could all be the old adage of not letting any catastrophe go to waste in furthering your agenda. Or it could be much worse and entail actually orchestrating the catastrophes themselves so that it's all a big scam.
As is often said, the nine most frightening words in the english language are, "I'm from the government and I'm
here to help." (Ronald Reagan)
My son and I have discussed this at length and there is a consistent theme for the last 40 years. In this case it is Wikileaks.
The thing that at first defies understanding, if true, is having an approximately 20 year old PFC with what should have been Top Secret clearance considering what he had access to. I am doubtful that a 20 year old PFC can acquire a Top Secret security clearance. Then allowing said PFC into and out of an area where he had access to this material carrying any kind of computer media. In this case it is said he had a CD RW disguised as a music CDROM (not much of a disguise). Then he had access all by himself without any oversight so that he could copy the material from a computer that did not have external media access disabled as it should have been (both CD write and USB stick access should have been disabled).
Over and over again we find the same pattern which appears once again. Someone in a position of authority (not our PFC) wants something to happen for an unknown reason. Then it is just a matter of finding the guy who may already have some motive for doing the wrong thing. You enhance that motive by making sure he talks with the right (wrong) people. Then you give him the access he would need to do the job and make sure the obstacles stay out of the way.
Think Lee Harvey Oswald, 1963. He somewhat magically went to Russia and returned. The last obstacle was the Secret Service agent who was supposed to be riding on the back bumper that day (he would have been in the line of fire). Hopefully you have seen the video where this agent is inexplicably ordered not to assume his normal position at the last moment much to his dismay.
The Christmas underwear bomber who received assistance getting on a plane, paying for a one-way ticket in cash, with no passport on an international flight all AFTER his father warns officials that his son is a threat.
We've seen how authorities spot these people in advance. The most recent case in Portland. Once they have them spotted it is only a matter of letting the ones that are likely to do what you want them to do get away with it. In fact, there was the FBI memo noting the problem with potential terrorists getting flight training BEFORE 9/11.
As they say follow the money.
Kennedy may have been about to pull the plug on Vietnam. Kennedy dies and we stay mired in Vietnam 10 more years.
9/11 happens and we get wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The shoe bomber fails to light his shoe (I have serious doubts whether it COULD be detonated). What do we get? The average citizen agrees to searches that previously would have been considered unreasonable.
The underwear bomber fails (again doubtful it could be detonated) and we get body scanners and intrusive pat downs that would have not only been considered unreasonable but rape.
Wikileaks happens and the government is on the verge of killing free speach on the internet and putting the FCC in control of the last free media.
This could all be the old adage of not letting any catastrophe go to waste in furthering your agenda. Or it could be much worse and entail actually orchestrating the catastrophes themselves so that it's all a big scam.
As is often said, the nine most frightening words in the english language are, "I'm from the government and I'm
here to help." (Ronald Reagan)
Monday, December 6, 2010
Watch your neighbor watch you
The following came from http://www.suite101.com/content/fear-and-secrecy-in-the-nazi-police-state-a260577
------------------
Jul 12, 2010 Michael Streich
Living in Hitler’s Germany characterized every aspect of what is often referred to as a “police state.” Everyday Germans were drafted into Nazi control and secrecy, often without realizing it. By employing fear techniques, few government agents, such as the Gestapo, were actually needed to control the masses. Such tactics involved normal citizens willing to spy on neighbors, teachers reporting on what their students may have said in class, and monitoring newspaper and radio usage.
-----------------
Then we have the following from your friendly United States government.
-----------------
Press Office
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Dec. 6, 2010
WASHINGTON -- Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano today announced the expansion of the Department’s national “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign to hundreds of Walmart stores across the country—launching a new partnership between DHS and Walmart to help the American public play an active role in ensuring the safety and security of our nation.
“Homeland security starts with hometown security, and each of us plays a critical role in keeping our country and communities safe,” said Secretary Napolitano. “I applaud Walmart for joining the ‘If You See Something, Say Something’ campaign. This partnership will help millions of shoppers across the nation identify and report indicators of terrorism, crime and other threats to law enforcement authorities.”
-----------------
See the similarity. If you don't you might need a new pair of glasses. Having the populace fearful and suspicious of each other and ready to turn each other in for the security of "the fatherland" or "the homeland" is how a facist government controls the people. It keeps them too busy to realize the real enemy is those who pit them against one another. They pit the poor against the rich, race against race, religion against religion, political group against political group. Why? Because united we stand and divided we fall.
Maybe we should build a bunch of Walmarts along our southern border.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Setting the Record Straight
There is an intenet hoax email being circulated perporting to cite the words of Dr. Emanuel Tanay. The words are not his, but the contents of the email are real. They are the words of Paul E. Marek and were published in 2007. The article can be found here http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/6996 and it is presented below.
For the record, Paul E. Marek is a second-generation Canadian, whose grandparents fled Czechoslovakia just prior to the Nazi takeover. He is an educational consultant specializing in programs that protect children from predatory adults.
Published: 03/18/07, 4:46 PM
Why the Peaceful Majority is Irrelevant
by Paul E. Marek
History lessons are often incredibly simple.
I used to know a man whose family were German aristocracy prior to World War II. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.
“Very few people were true Nazis,” he said, “but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.”
We are told again and again by experts and talking heads that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unquantified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars world wide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or execute honor killings. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard, quantifiable fact is that the “peaceful majority” is the “silent majority,” and it is cowed and extraneous.
Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a war-mongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across Southeast Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians - most killed by sword, shovel and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were “peace loving”?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt; yet, for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by the fanatics. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because, like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Bosnians, Afghanis, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians and many others, have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us, watching it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts: the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Adar 28, 5767 / 18 March 07
For the record, Paul E. Marek is a second-generation Canadian, whose grandparents fled Czechoslovakia just prior to the Nazi takeover. He is an educational consultant specializing in programs that protect children from predatory adults.
Published: 03/18/07, 4:46 PM
Why the Peaceful Majority is Irrelevant
by Paul E. Marek
History lessons are often incredibly simple.
I used to know a man whose family were German aristocracy prior to World War II. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.
“Very few people were true Nazis,” he said, “but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.”
We are told again and again by experts and talking heads that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unquantified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.
The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars world wide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or execute honor killings. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard, quantifiable fact is that the “peaceful majority” is the “silent majority,” and it is cowed and extraneous.
Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a war-mongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across Southeast Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians - most killed by sword, shovel and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were “peace loving”?
History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt; yet, for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by the fanatics. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because, like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.
Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Bosnians, Afghanis, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians and many others, have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us, watching it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts: the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Adar 28, 5767 / 18 March 07
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Obama as God
So where's the cover with Obama as Mohammed? Oh, that's right, if you annoy the Religion of Peace, or would that be the religion of blow you to pieces, they might declare that you should be killed.
Of course Obama isn't God or even "a god" with a small g. After all he can't even keep his stories straight without the assistance of a teleprompter. As such, he's not even a particularly adept empty suit.
Instead, Obama is just the latest "installed" figure head for those who pull the strings to advance their agenda for further control of the masses. He's just the front man.
Manipulation is often achieved by offering people two choices, neither one of which is actually a real choice, while hiding the other possible choices.
For example, you can have my healthcare changes or none, you can have my immigration policies or none, you can have my economic policies or none, you can have naked body scanning by the TSA or sexual molestation frisking by the same TSA.
Those who are informed know there are other choices. Putting up with manipulation is not required.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
TSA Psychological Warfare
Listen to this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJGvsAgpfig
I think it can be successfully argued that both body scanners and the agressive pat downs one can be subjected to if choosing to "opt out" is little more than psychological warfare being perpetrated on the general public. It does nothing to enhance security by virtue of the way it is being done. However, psycholgical warfare is a two way street.
Imagine asking a TSA agent if he is aware that the latest terrorist bomb designs are triggered by body scanners and asking him where he figures it might be a safe place for him to stand?
Imagine asking the "pat down" person if they are aware that the latest terrorist bombs are pressure triggered and asking them if they are getting paid enough to risk triggering one?
Of course you better have a recording of what you say to be able to prove you made no threats.
The truth is that if there were any credible bomb threat they wouldn't be radiating the bombs and having unprotected minimum wage untrained personnel risk setting them off in the middle of a crowd of people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJGvsAgpfig
I think it can be successfully argued that both body scanners and the agressive pat downs one can be subjected to if choosing to "opt out" is little more than psychological warfare being perpetrated on the general public. It does nothing to enhance security by virtue of the way it is being done. However, psycholgical warfare is a two way street.
Imagine asking a TSA agent if he is aware that the latest terrorist bomb designs are triggered by body scanners and asking him where he figures it might be a safe place for him to stand?
Imagine asking the "pat down" person if they are aware that the latest terrorist bombs are pressure triggered and asking them if they are getting paid enough to risk triggering one?
Of course you better have a recording of what you say to be able to prove you made no threats.
The truth is that if there were any credible bomb threat they wouldn't be radiating the bombs and having unprotected minimum wage untrained personnel risk setting them off in the middle of a crowd of people.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Liberals don't relize what they are saying
Colin Powell said that he sees illegals all the time and that they are working all around his house. However, it is actually a violation of federal law to knowingly hire an illegal alien, or once you know someone is illegal to keep employing them. Someone must have pointed this out to Mr. Powell.
So, now it is time for a clarification. Now his comment has been further "clarified" to point out that he doesn't actaully employ any of them. He just sees them working for other people. So what is the problem with that?
Well, one would assume he didn't walk up to any of these people who are working for someone else and ask them "for their papers." Heaven forbid. Only a Nazi would do that. Mr. Powell wouldn't be caught dead doing it. So, how does he know they are illegal? Obviously by just looking at them. What?
Mr. Powell is racial profiling? He is determining someones legal status by their appearance?
If so Mr. Powell is a racist and doesn't even realize he admitting to it. Way to go.
For those of you who are illegal, you might find it interesting what liberals really think. The bottom line is that they need a "poor" class that depends upon them to keep them in a position of power. However, for them to stay in power they need the "poor" class to never go away. Yes, that's right. You won't really get anywhere by depending on them, because they are depending on you to stay "oppressed."
So, now it is time for a clarification. Now his comment has been further "clarified" to point out that he doesn't actaully employ any of them. He just sees them working for other people. So what is the problem with that?
Well, one would assume he didn't walk up to any of these people who are working for someone else and ask them "for their papers." Heaven forbid. Only a Nazi would do that. Mr. Powell wouldn't be caught dead doing it. So, how does he know they are illegal? Obviously by just looking at them. What?
Mr. Powell is racial profiling? He is determining someones legal status by their appearance?
If so Mr. Powell is a racist and doesn't even realize he admitting to it. Way to go.
For those of you who are illegal, you might find it interesting what liberals really think. The bottom line is that they need a "poor" class that depends upon them to keep them in a position of power. However, for them to stay in power they need the "poor" class to never go away. Yes, that's right. You won't really get anywhere by depending on them, because they are depending on you to stay "oppressed."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
